Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco

107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood (1993), State v. Gregory (2006)

72 state decisions

29019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · People v. . Fielding · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 73 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a defendant is in jail awaiting sentencing on another charge and is amenable to process, the State must prove that it acted with good faith and due diligence to bring the defendant to trial after the filing of the information.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First, each of the elements of the lesser offense must be a necessary element of the offense charged. . . . Second, the evidence in the case must support an inference that the lesser crime was committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “lost to the prosecutor during the major portion of the time between the filing of the complaint and the defendant's arraignment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.