State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sullivan · State v. Ammons · State v. JH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I think the statute would allow for a respondent to be eligible for a deferred disposition so long as he does not have a prior deferred disposition. And it’s pretty clear that he does not have a prior disposition at this time. So really the inquiry is not whether the Respondent is eligible but whether the Court is going to exercise discretion in giving it to him. I can imagine a scenario in which I wouldn’t do it, for instance, if he had four pending matters. I probably wouldn’t give it to him if he had three pending matters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson“Statement of Juvenile on Submittal or Stipulation to Facts for Deferred Disposition”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson“[a] juvenile is eligible for deferred disposition”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.