Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 WIS 180 - Kendall v. Beaudry

Kendall v. Beaudry’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1947

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aldridge v. Muirhead · Dayton v. Walsh · Mayers v. Kaiser · Tripp v. Childs · Ansorge v. Barth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In ascertaining the existence of this element, the question is whether the debtor does in fact give or hire his services to another, the fruits thereof to belong to that other, or does he merely exert himself under the color of another’s name, with the understanding or purpose that the fruits of 1ns exertion shall be his, hut screened by that other’s name from his creditors. The former situation satisfies all that is meant by the expression ‘good faith’ in this connection. - * * * He may be led to so act because of the hopelessness of attempting to devote his efforts to a business of his own, where they would be rendered abortive by the prompt attach of creditors as soon as they became at all productive. Such motive or reason is not inconsistent with the good faith of the transaction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.