Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 A2D 578 - In Re Cain

In Re Cain’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1967
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Monacelli v. Grimes · 32 Del. Ch. 527 - E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Clark · In re Reeves · 26 Del. Ch. 344 - First National Bank v. Andrews · Keedy v. Sterling Electric Appliance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever any person not mentally ill, a resident in this State, by reason of advanced age or mental infirmity or physical incapacity is unable properly to manage and care for his property, and in consequence thereof is in danger of dissipating or losing such property, or of becoming the victim of designing persons, such person, his mother, father, brother, sister, husband, wife, child, next of kin, creditor, debtor, any public agency or, in the absence of such person or persons, or public agency, or their refusal or inability to act, any other person, may file in the Court of Chancery of the county in which such aged, mentally infirm or physically incapacitated person resides, his petition, under oath, setting forth the facts, praying the Court to adjudge that such person is unable properly to manage and care for his property, and requesting the appointment of a guardian of the property of such person.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.