Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · United States v. Ruiz · United States v. Moussaoui · McCann v. Mangialardi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“planted” evidence to wrongly obtain convictions. Rather, the employees who stole the evidence did so because it in fact consisted of illegal narcotics that they could resell or take for personal use. Brown v. State, 108 A.3d 1201, 1204-05 (Del.2015) (citation omitted); see also Cannon v. State, 127 A.3d 1164, 1168 (Del.2015) (citing Aricidiacono v. State, 125 A.3d 677 (Del.2015) (no evidence of tampering)) (citations omitted). 6 . B37. 7 . On cross-examination, Detective Maher testified that he .functioned as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.