Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 ALA 590 - Stickney v. Moore

Stickney v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
September 1972
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1972

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

50189519001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aurora City v. West · Pana v. Bowler · McGuire v. Van Pelt · Eslava v. Lepretre · Woodall v. Kelly & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule in equity generally is, to allow interest whenever it would have been recoverable at law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.