108 Ala. 601
Decided November 15, 1895
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1895-11-15
Tried before Hon. T. M. Arrington. This action was brought by John Eandolph for the use of Josephine Wilson, Matt P. Crittenden and Lester C. Smith, against Nathan Griel, and sought to recover of the defendant damages for his failure to comply with his bid at a sale of certain lands ordered sold by the probate court of Montgomery county for purposes of a-division among the joint owners. • The evidence showed that on April 24th, 1890, Josephine Wilson and her husband filed a…
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1895-11-15
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1954
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1*605ON APPLICATION NOB. RE-HEARING.
¶2Ill support of .the proposition last stated, in the foregoing opinion, that it was not necessary for the petition to set out the residence of the petitioners, in order to confer jurisdiction, we refer to what is said on the subject in the opinion filed at this, the November term, 1895, in the case of Hillens et al. v. Brinsfield, from Montgomery Probate Court.
¶3Application for re-hearing overruled.