State v. Lippi’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““* * * The practical test is to eliminate the elements in one charge and determine whether the facts left would support the other charge.” State v. Mitchell, 106 Ariz. 492, 495 , 478 P.2d 517, 520 (1970). See State v. Lippi, 108 Ariz 342, 498 P.2d 209 , (1972).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Williams · State v. Tucker

2. ““A defendant’s rights to cross-examine and confront the witnesses against him are not abridged by the introduction at trial of preliminary hearing testimony where the accused had the opportunity at the preliminary hearing to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him. (citations omitted)” State v. Lippi, 108 Ariz. 342, 346 , 498 P.2d 209, 213 (1972).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Watson

3. ““An act or omission which is made punishable in different ways by different sections of the laws may be punished under either, but in no event under more than one. An acquittal or conviction and sentence under either one bars a prosecution for the same act or omission under any other.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Williams