Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 CALAPP2D 379 - Frazier v. Moffatt

Frazier v. Moffatt’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 1999

18 state decisions

7019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pargoud v. United States · United States v. Manton · Yaselli v. Goff · Yaselli v. Goff · Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n consonance with the spirit and intent of the foregoing constitutional provisions [Separation of powers], the courts of this state have uniformly held that the Legislature is without power to confer upon courts jurisdiction that is not given or authorized to be given them by the Constitution, and that the Legislature can impose no duties on the judiciary but such as are of a judicial character.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Prom the foregoing it follows that when a magistrate acts pursuant to the provisions of section 838 of the Penal Code he is acting within his jurisdiction and in the performance of a judicial act, done in the execution of his office and within the purview of his general authority. When so acting a magistrate is therefore not amenable to any civil action for damages. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.