Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 CALAPP2D 475 - Grossblatt v. Wright

Grossblatt v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 21 Cal. 3d 284 - People v. Scott (1978), Nwosu v. Uba (2004)

3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

1201951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. Warner Holding Co. · Hepner v. United States · People v. One 1941 Chevrolet Coupe · United States v. Moore · Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutory penalties existed at common law, and debt was the appropriate action for the recovery thereof where no other remedy was specified, because the money due under such statute gave rise to a debt, the underlying theory being an implied promise which the law annexed to the liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A jury trial was a matter of right in the common-law action of debt, and consequently it exists in all civil actions under modern practice which formerly would have fallen within this form of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'[i]f an act of parliament inflict a certain penalty for a particular act, an action of debt will lie for the penalty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.