Kulmacz v. Milas’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2013
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stueck v. G. C. Murphy Co. · Barri v. Schwarz Bros. Co. · Lengyel v. Peregrin · New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Russell · Wheeler v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“or otherwise bounded and described as of records may appear,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“be deemed part of the deeds referring thereto,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.