Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 CONNAPP 264 - State v. Goriss

State v. Goriss’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dunn v. United States · State v. Hinton · State v. Decaro · State v. Manning · Arnone v. Town of Enfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Surrebuttal evidence is that which is offered to meet evidence raised in rebuttal. [O]nly evidence to explain away new facts brought forward by the proponent in rebuttal ... is properly admissible [in surrebuttal].... [Our Supreme Court previously has] stated that there is no constitutional right to present surrebuttal evidence.... The presentation of surrebuttal evidence is a matter resting squarely within the discretion of the trial court.... The defendant must demonstrate some compelling circumstance and the proffered evidence must be of such importance that its omission puts in doubt the achievement of a just result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.