Zebert v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
108 F. 449 · 1901
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1926
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Denny v. Pironi · Bondurant v. Watson · Kranshaar v. New Haven Steamboat Co. · Fife v. Whittell · People v. Schoonmaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘It may happen that ono may have two places of residence, in one of which he resides during one portion of the year, in the other during the remaining portion. In such case the place at which he happens to be constitutes his residence so long as he is there, and ceases to be such as soon as he leaves it for the other place.’ ” Baker, J., in Zebert v. Hunt (C. C.) 108 Fed. 449 , TJ. S. G. O., Hist, of Indiana.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.