Johnston v. McNealy

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 4, 1940.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1940-01-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1974

1 district · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on 30 F. Supp. 312 - McNealy v. Johnston

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1940-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and A. J. Zirpoli, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Vincent Cullinan, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein, 30 F.Supp. 312, dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue forthwith.