Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 F.2d 421 - Shor v. McGregor

Shor v. McGregor’s Empirical Analysis

108 F.2d 421 · 1939

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 1982
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1982

9 federal appellate ·

70193919401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Johnson · Acme Harvester Company v. Beekman Lumber Company · Louisville Trust Company v. Leonard Comingor · Byron Babbitt v. Howard Dutcher T · Re James B Wood and Jethro P Hendersons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a. The courts of the United States hereinbefore defined as courts of bankruptcy are hereby created courts of bankruptcy and are hereby invested, * * * with such jurisdiction at law and in equi--¿Q H5 H* “(21) Require receivers or trustees appointed in proceedings not under this title, assignees for the benefit of eredi-tors, and agents authorized to take possession of or to liquidate a person’s property [italics ours] to deliver the property in their possession or under their control to the receiver or trustee appointed under this title * * * and in all such cases to account to the court for the disposition by them of the property of such bankrupt or debtor: Provided,, however, That such delivery and accounting shall not be required, * * * if the receiver or trustee was appointed, the assignment was made, or the agent was authorized more than four months prior to the date of bankruptcy. Upon such accounting, the court shall reexamine and determine the propriety and reasonableness of all disbursements made out of such property by such receiver, trustee, assignee, or agent, either to himself or to others, for services and expenses under such receivership, trusteeship, assignment, or agency, and shall, unless such disbursements have been approved, upon notice to creditors and other parties in interest, by a court of competent jurisdiction prior to the proceeding under this title, surcharge such receiver, trustee, as-signee, or agent the amount of any disbursement determined by ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.