Sampsell v. Anches’s Empirical Analysis
108 F.2d 945 · 1939
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1997
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 107 · 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Sac and Fox Indians of the Mississippi in Iowa v. Sac and Fox Indians of the Mississippi in Oklahoma · Ferguson v. Standley · Teese v. Huntingdon · John Reavis v. Jose Fianza · Corrigan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A promise to pay for goods purchased without an intention to do so is a fraud especially denounced by the statutes of California (Cal.Civ. Code §§ 1572, 1710) and in most jurisdictions such a promise is itself fraudulent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.