Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 F.3d 1075 - Budget Rent-A-Car v. Crawford

Budget Rent-A-Car v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

108 F.3d 1075 · 1997

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 2014
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2014

13 federal appellate · 4 district ·

170199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Wilton v. Seven Falls Co. · Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America · Chamberlain v. Allstate Insurance · Rowan Companies v. Griffin · Continental Casualty Co. v. Robsac Industries

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a district court must consider the impact on sound judicial administration, and federalism concerns against forum shopping that may result from the issuance of a declaration regarding unresolved issues of state law in a diversity action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[does] not indicate the bases for its decision to reach the merits of [a] claim for declaratory relief, we cannot determine whether it abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “relieve the district court of its duty to weigh all relevant factors before exercising its discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.