Gullickson v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
108 F.3d 1290 · 1997
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 24 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 149 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably In Re: Milton Keeney, Debtor. Milton W. Keeney v. Mary Jean Smith (2000), Village of San Jose v. McWilliams (2002)
16 federal appellate · 24 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Equitable Bank v. Miller · Bank of Pennsylvania v. Adlman · Dalton v. Internal Revenue Service · Clark v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) done by the debtor and; (2) involved transferring, removing, destroying, mutilating or concealing any of the debtor’s property; (3) within one year before the date of the petition or postpetition; (4) with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“debtor knowingly and fraudulently made an oath and that the oath relates to a material fact”). 35 . Garland, 417 B.R. at 814-15 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). 36 . Id. at 814 (a § 727(a)(4)(A) false oath may be an”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“However, we review the bankruptcy court’s findings which underpin its conclusions under the more deferential clearly erroneous standard. In re Wes Dor, Inc., 996 F.2d 237 , 241 (10th Cir.1993). We review de novo mixed questions consisting primarily of legal conclusions drawn from the facts. Id. Finally, we are cognizant in our review of the requirement that the Bankruptcy Code must be construed liberally in favor of the debtor and strictly against the creditor. In re Adlman, 541 F.2d 999, 1003 (2d Cir.1976).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.