Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 F.3d 1371

Docket No. 96-7700.

Booth v. Loflin a

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 27, 1997 Decided March 13, 1997.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-03-13

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on James Dickerson v. Maersk Container Service

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-03-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Anthony Booth, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Howard Moss, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Loflin, No. CA-95-135-3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/108/f3d/1371 · .json · Public domain