Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 F.3d 1371

Docket No. 96-2725.

Daughety v. Wamsley

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 13, 1997. Decided March 18, 1997.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-03-18

Relies on James Dickerson v. Maersk Container Service

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-03-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Mamie Daughety, Appellant Pro Se.

Steven Edward Tiller, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, Barbara Lee Ayres, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-17 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daughety v. Wamsley, No. CA-96-2660-AMD (D.Md. Nov. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/108/f3d/1371 · .json · Public domain