Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 F.3d 1372

Docket No. 97-1088.

Jafari v. Good

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 13, 1997. Decided March 20, 1997.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-03-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1999

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Mattingly v. Joey's Bar and Grill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se.

Anisa Patrice Kelley, FISCELLA, KELLEY & MOONEY, Richmond, Virginia; Franklin Brawner Greer, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Alice Ann Berkebile, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jafari v. Good, No. CA-96-825 (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/108/f3d/1372 · .json · Public domain