Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 F.3d 1372

Docket No. 96-7121.

McCall v. Ray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 27, 1997. Decided March 11, 1997.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-03-11

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mattingly v. Joey's Bar and Grill

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-03-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Boundary McCall, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCall v. Ray, No. CA-96-1059-9-21JC (D.S.C. June 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/108/f3d/1372 · .json · Public domain