Saylor’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably McClellan v. Cantrell (2000), Aleta Beaupied v. Amy Chang (1998)
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Cecchini Impulsora Del Territorio Sur Sa v. Cecchini Robustelli Impulsora Del Territorio Sur Sa · Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Gregg v. Rahm · Riso · Apte v. Japra
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as good a position as the [bankruptcy appellate panel]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“case constituted a de facto abandonment of the property); Schwaber v. Reed (In re Reed), 940 F.2d 1317 , 1321 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]bandonment requires formal notice and a hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.