Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 F.3d 625 - Bann v. Ingram Micro, Inc.

Bann v. Ingram Micro, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

108 F.3d 625 · 1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2012

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

170199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Silas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Houston Capital Resources Fund, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Bann's notice of appeal, filed after the entry of the judgment but before the disposition of his motion to reinstate the case, was ineffective to appeal from the judgment until the entry of the order disposing of that motion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless the court first finds that a lesser sanction would not have served the interests of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.