Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 F.3d 868 - Miller v. Lock

Miller v. Lock’s Empirical Analysis

108 F.3d 868 · 1997

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
March 2010
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2010

13 federal appellate ·

90199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Weissbrodt v. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.