108 F. Supp. 2d 167 - Mazza v. Bratton’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Bragdon v. Abbott · Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether plaintiff had an impairment; (2) whether the impairment affected a 'major life activity' within the meaning of the ADA; and (3) whether that major life activity was substantially limited by the impairment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“even if a plaintiff alleges a firing because of a medical condition, she can bring a claim under the ADA only if her medical condition rises to the level of a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if she makes a showing of any one of the following:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.