Miller v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1913 · 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1917 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams · Sandin v. Conner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mandatory language in prison regulations does not create a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vick v. Core Civic
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.