Dorato v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Oliver v. Woods , 209 F.3d at 1186 . 1. Investigative Detentions and Reasonable Suspicion . An encounter that is not consensual may nevertheless be justified as an investigative detention. See Dorato v. Smith , 108 F.Supp.3d 1064 , 1118 (D.N.M. 2015) (Browning, J.). An investigative detention occurs when an officer stops and briefly detains a person”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. at 29 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 . In evaluating the validity of the stop-and-frisk, the totality of the circumstances must be considered. See Florida v. Bostick , 501 U.S. 429 , 436, 111 S.Ct. 2382 , 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991). The Tenth Circuit has recognized the doctrine in Terry v. Ohio of an investigative detention -- a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) gang tattoo; (2) presence in a high crime area; (3) abrupt move away from the officer as soon as [the defendant] saw [the officer]; (4) glancing about in a manner consistent with an attempt to find a route to flee; and, (5) approach to [a private] home's back door without conversing with the residents visible inside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.