Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 Ga. App. 650

134 S.E.2d 526

Lynch v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1963

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1963-11-14

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1975

10 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The defendant having made an unsworn statement to the court and jury in his defense, the court erred in charging the jury to the effect that the defendant had the right to testify under oath as any other witness. . . and in connection with such charge stating to the jury, `Now, the defendant in this case elected to make an unsworn statement' ... `The failure of a defendant to testify shall create no presumption against him, and no comment shall be made because of such failure.' The court erred in overruling the second special ground of defendant's motion for a new trial assigning error because of such charge.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including 136 Ga. App. 165 - Thomas v. State, 127 Ga. App. 463 - Wynn v. State

Relies on 108 Ga. App. 316 - McCann v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-11-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Frankum, Judge.

¶1 1. The defendant having made an unsworn statement to the court and jury in his defense, the court erred in charging the jury to the effect that the defendant had the right to testify under oath as any other witness and to be examined and cross examined as any other witness, and in connection with such charge stating to the jury, “Now, the defendant in this case elected to make an unsworn statement.” Code § 38-415, as amended by Ga. L. 1962, pp. 133, 134, provides in part: “The failure of a defendant to testify shall create no presumption against him, and no comment shall be *651 made because of such failure.” The court erred in overruling the second special ground of defendant’s motion for a new trial assigning error because of such charge. McCann v. State, 108 Ga. App. 316 (132 SE2d 813).

Decided November 14, 1963. Allyn M. Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Cohen Anderson, Solicitor General, contra.

¶2 2. The first special ground of the motion relates to a matter not likely- to occur on another trial; the third special ground is not meritorious, and the general grounds are not passed upon inasmuch as the evidence on another trial may not be the same.

¶3 Judgment reversed.

Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.
/108/gaapp/650 · .json · Public domain