Taomae v. Lingle’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2021
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp. · State of Ohio Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park Dist for Summit County State of Ohio Wadsworth · Coon v. City and County of Honolulu · Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright · Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p] oints not argued may be deemed waived.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. DL v. CL · State v. TUNOA“[W]here it is alleged that the legislature has acted unconstitutionally, this court has consistently held that every enactment of the legislature is presumptively constitutional, and a party challenging the statute has the burden of showing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt. The infraction should be plain, clear, manifest, and unmistakable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the appellant `makes no discernible argument in support of that position”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.