108 Ind. App. 369 - Greis, Trustee v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1976
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. Kistler · Kempton Hotel Co. v. Ricketts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A plea in abatement is not a favorite of the law, and for this reason it must allege with greatest certainty in every particular every fact necessary to its sufficiency.... “To support the plea, the evidence should have disclosed with the same degree of particularity and certainty as the pleading the place of his ‘usual place of residence,’ so as to permit jurisdiction over his person to be acquired by service upon him by leaving a true copy of the summons at his usual place of residence, as provided by statute.’’ (Our emphasis)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.