108 Ind. App. 617 - In Re Zeits’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1996
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New York Central Railroad Company v. Sarah White · Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co. · McDermott v. State · Bacon v. Christian · Macy v. Combs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(5) Services performed by an individual for remuneration shall be deemed to be employment subject to this act unless and until it is shown to the satisfaction of the board that: "(A) Such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such service, both under his contract of service and in fact; and "(B) Such individual . . . is an agent who receives remuneration solely upon a commission basis and who is the master of his own time and effort.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The declaration of public policy of the Act (§52-1501, Burns’ 1933 (Supp.)) clearly indicates that the Act is purposed as a relief to unemployment for those who for a time enjoy a service relationship followed by a period of unemployment. Therefore, any contract for the performance of service will be scrutinized beyond the mere form for the purpose of determining whether the relationship of the parties involved falls within the provisions of the Act.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.