Dye v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1982
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trustees of Amherst College v. Ritch · Fairchild v. . Edson Edson v. . Bartow · Silvers v. Howard · Holmes v. Campbell College · Gemmel v. Fletcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is too well settled to require extended discussion that a court of equity has no power to reform a will. (See Holmes v. Campbell College, 87 Kan. 597 , 125 Pac. 25 , and authorities there cited; 23 R. C. L. 318-320.)” (p. 305.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hoover v. Roberts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.