Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 KAN 770 - Deeds v. Deeds

Deeds v. Deeds’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2024

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

5019211930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murray v. Buell · Miller v. Miller · Williams v. Board of Education · State v. Foren · Johnson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Packard v. Packard, 34 Kan. 53 , 7 Pac. 628 , it was said that as the divorce to the wife was granted by reason of the fault and aggression of the husband she should be allowed such alimony as would maintain her and her children in as good condition as if she were still living with her husband. In Leach v. Leach, 46 Kan. 724 , 27 Pac. 131 , where thg divorce was granted to the husband for the fault of the wife, and he had property worth from ten to fourteen thousand dollars, and owed about $500, and he was required to pay all the costs and support all of the children, five in number, it was held that the award of $2,500, in addition to certain personal property, was not erroneous. It was said in the opinion that ordinarily $2,500 or $3,000, out of an estate worth from $10,000 to $14,000, would be too small, but in this case it was probably right, and at .most this court could not say that the court below should grant her any larger sum.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.