Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 KAN 88 - Abbey v. Schaff

Abbey v. Schaff’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1950
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1950

4 state decisions

201920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Manson · Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Morrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Neither railroad companies nor cattle-guard manufacturers who succeed in having their product installed on railroads are permitted to establish standards.” (p. 89.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.