¶1The appeal avoided the judgment of the police court, and rendered immaterial all questions of the form of that judgment or the correctness of the previous proceedings in that court. Commonwealth v. Tinkham, 14 Gray, 12. Commonwealth v. McCormack, 7 Allen, 532.
¶2Exceptions overruled.
¶3 A similar decision was made in Hampshire at September term 1873 in the case of
¶4Commonwealth vs. William J. Sheehan.
¶5This was a complaint for keeping intoxicating liquor for unlawful sale, made on December 17, 1872, to Albion P. Peck, a trial justice for that county, whose record recited that the defendant was brought before him on that day, “ and said complaint is read to him, and being asked whether he is guilty or not of the offence within charged upon him, says he is not guilty of said offence and waives examination, and fully understanding the defence of said defendant it is adjudged by the said trial justice that said defendant is guilty of said offence,” and that he be sentenced to pay a fine and costs, and be committed to the house of correction for twenty days, from which sentence he appealed.
¶6In the superior court, on the appeal, the defendant moved for a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that by the record of the trial justice it was manifest “ that there was no proper conviction before him, in that the defendant was allowed to waive examination, and on a plea of not guilty and waiver of examination was convicted and sentenced without examination, and so there was no proper appeal.” The motion was overruled by Bacon, J., and the defendant was tried and found guilty, and alleged exceptions.
¶7W. G. Bassett, for the defendant.
¶8C. R. Train, Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.
¶9By the Court. The appeal vacated the whole proceedings before the magistrate, and rendered the alleged irregularities immaterial. Commonwealth v. Calhane, ante, 431, and cases there cited. Exceptions overruled.