Markey v. Corey’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 1963
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aniba v. Yeomans · Hatch v. Barrett · Adams v. Blethen · Stevens v. Hannan · Shelby v. Judd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ For value received I hereby assign all interest in and to this note to Ralph E. Watson.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gale v. Mayhew““ I hereby assign the within note to Matthew M. Markey and Catherine Sundars.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gale v. Mayhew
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.