108 Mich. 409
Decided February 26, 1896
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1896-02-26
Assumpsit by Albert Towl against James M. Bradley for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1912
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relies on Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire Insurance
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1896-02-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This case is within the rule laid down in Monaghan v. Insurance Co., 53 Mich. 245. The defendant had a right to question the jurors upon the subject of their prejudices against the defense of the statute of limitations, as a means of determining whether or not to exercise the right of peremptory challenge.
¶2As the other assignments of error are not discussed in the brief, we do not pass upon them.
¶3The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.