Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 MICH 527 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
8
states following
June 1953
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1953

20 state decisions

601896190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Application of Jacobs · Health Department v. Rector of Trinity Church · People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City Prison · Coit & Co. v. Sutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not disputed that the State may regulate the use of private property, when the health, morals, or welfare of the public demands it. Such laws have their origin in necessity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.