108 Mich. 640
Decided March 24, 1896
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1896-03-24
<p>Certiorari — Special Appeal.</p> <p>Certiorari will not lie, in advance of final judgment, to review the action of the circuit court in overruling the errors assigned on a special appeal from a justice’s judgment.</p>
Relies on Palms v. Campau · Peterson v. Fowler
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Writ quashed · Decided 1896-03-24
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1932
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This is certiorari to review the ruling of the circuit court in overruling the objections of plaintiff in error taken by special appeal. No final judgment has been rendered. It was intimated on the argument that the writ was improvidently issued. We so hold. See Palms v. Campau, 11 Mich. 109. In Peter*641son v. Fowler, 76 Mich. 258, final judgment had heen entered.
¶2Writ will be quashed, with costs.