108 Mich. App. 746 - Randolph v. Ackerson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2007
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That is indicative of the singular nature of the activity in question. The fact that Defendant’s venture required a great amount of effort and a great amount of time is not determinative. Since Defendant’s activity was not a ‘stated occupation’ or a ‘customary engagement,’ it was not continuous.” Id. 310 N.W.2d at 866 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.