Spurr v. Spurr

Decided May 14, 1909

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1909-05-14

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $512.50, alleged to have been paid defendant upon fraudulent representations. The case was tried Before Hallam, J., who made findings in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the findings and decision, it appealed.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1914

3 state decisions

Relies on Hospes v. Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1909-05-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cubiam.

¶1Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying his motion to set aside its decision and findings. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor certificate of the trial judge that the record contains everything offered or considered on the hearing of the motion, nor the certificate of the clerk of the district court that the return contains a true and correct transcript of all the records and files in the action.

¶2Held, following Hospes v. Northwestern Mnfg. & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 43 N. W. 180, that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.