Chrisman v. Magee’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1949
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Patch v. White · Pate v. Bushong · Gordon v. Perry · Brown v. Grant · Ehrman v. Hoskins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““'Mr. Page further says (see page 571 [ 67 So. 901 ]) that all the courts practically agree that if ‘after the false description, or part of a description, is discarded, there remains in the devise language sufficiently full and accurate to identify the subject of the gift with sufficient certainty, the property thus indicated will pass.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Countiss v. King““The greater weight of'- modern authority probably is that where the will is so worded as to show testator’s intention to pass his lands in the given plat or section and the like, the description of the particular lot, quarter section, and the like may be rejected, if erroneous.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Countiss v. King
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.