State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 1997
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hennis · State v. Morgan · State v. Jones · State v. Steward · 104 N.C. App. 675 - State v. Haskins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]uch evidence (1) is offered for a proper purpose, see N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 404(b) (1992); (2) is relevant, see N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rules 401 and 104(b) (1992); (3) has probative value which is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant, see N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 403 (1992); and (4) if requested, is coupled with a limiting instruction, see N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 105 (1992). State v. Haskins, 104 N.C. App. 675, 679 , 411 S.E.2d 376, 380 (1991), disc. rev. denied, 331 N.C. 287 , 417 S.E.2d 256 (1992);”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Everette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.