108 N.C. App. 476 - State v. Baymon’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “There have been many times we talk a lot about what we do over the weekends, they relate things to me, and she would come and say things like she had been to church, and in a couple of weeks, she'd come and she would be singing a song I know she had learned in church, so I knew she hadn't made that up. She might would come [sic] she had been shopping. She'd have on some new clothes so I knew that it was true. She could go outside, they go outside with my assistant, and she could come in and tell me things that went on and I know that they are true.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Baymon · State v. Baymon

2. “there is a distinction between testimony from a witness such as Dr. Everett that a child victim was truthful or untruthful, which is inadmissible, and testimony that the expert discerned no evidence that the child had been `coached.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Baymon

3. “had an opportunity ..., during the course of a year, to observe her [the victim] in terms of relating factual happenings to you [Ms. Everett].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Baymon