Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 NEB 428 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
7
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2007

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

40192219301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franklin v. State · People v. Elmore · People v. Lee Nam Chin · Curry v. State · Grammer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t must be borne in mind that, defendant having pleaded 'not guilty,' every issue in the case was thereby controverted and it was then incumbent on the state to introduce the best evidence within its power to controvert the plea and prove defendant's guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.