Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 NEB 632 - Linch v. Dobson

Linch v. Dobson’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2000

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

60192219301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Birch v. Abercrombie · King v. Smythe · Stevens v. Luther · Miller v. Week · Johnson v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the car is kept for the use and pleasure of the family, and one member of the family is using it for his individual pleasure, or for one of the family purposes for which it is kept, it comes strictly within the reason of the rule that, in such use, the member of the family is acting as the agent, in furthering the purposes of the owner as truly as though other members of the family were in the car with him, and that the owner can be held responsible for damages resulting from the negligent operation of the car while so used.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the head of a family has purchased or maintains a car for the pleasure of his family, he is, under the so-called ‘family purpose’ doctrine, held liable for injuries inflicted in the negligent operation of the car while it is being used by members of the family for their own pleasure, on the theory that it is being used for the purpose for which it is kept, and that in operating it the member of the family is acting as the agent or servant of the owner.” Linch v. Dobson, 108 Neb. 632 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.