Redmen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Kirksey v. State (1996), Coble v. State (2010)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Godfrey v. Georgia · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Spaziano v. Florida · Carella v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district attorney . . . shall endorse thereon the names of such witnesses as are known to him at the time of filing the information, and shall also endorse upon the information the names of such other witnesses as may become known to him before the trial at such time as the court may, by rule or otherwise, prescribe; but this does not preclude the calling of witnesses whose names, or the materiality of whose testimony, are first learned by the district attorney . . . upon the trial. ... He shall not endorse the name of any witness whom he does not reasonably expect to call.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Dossey v. State“psychiatric evidence purporting to predict the future dangerousness of a defendant is highly unreliable and, therefore, inadmissible at death penalty sentencing hearings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Greene v. State“[ajbsent evidence to the contrary, an unendorsed witness is presumed to have been unknown to the district attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dossey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.