Carrell v. Carrell’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schwartz v. Schwartz · Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co. · Walsh v. Walsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s community property, retirement benefits are afforded certain rights which do not attach to spousal support awards. Specifically, community property is not subject to future modification whereas spousal support can be modified upon a change of circumstances, remarriage, or death. NRS 125.150(5), (7). Consequently, the district court erred when it characterized [the wife’s] community property as “spousal support,” thereby subjecting it to possible future modification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wolff v. Wolff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.