Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 N.M. 281 - Armijo v. Save 'N Gain

Armijo v. Save 'N Gain’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Wilson v. Denver (1998), Chavez v. City of Albuquerque (1997)

28 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · State v. Ramirez · Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Guerra · Wammack v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n the absence of an express grant of authority, the power of any administrative agency to reconsider its final decision exists only where the statutory provisions creating the agency indicate a legislative intent to permit the agency to carry into effect such power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.